i) In general. The share of a controlled participant in the reasonably expected benefits is consistent with its reasonably expected benefits, divided by the sum of the reasonably expected benefits covered in point (j) 1 (i) of this section of all controlled participants. RAB`s actions need to be updated to reflect changes in economic conditions, participant activity and practices, and ongoing changes in intangible assets under the CSA. In determining the actions of the RAB at any given time, it is reasonable to estimate the reasonably expected benefits over the entire period, past and future of the use of intangible costs and to consider appropriate updates to reflect the most reliable data on past and future future results available on that date. To this end, RAB actions intended for a specific purpose cannot be updated for this purpose, as a result of information that was not available at the time of the finding. For example, RAB`s shares to determine IDC shares for a given fiscal year (as defined in points b) (i) and d) (4) in this section) cannot be recalculated on the basis of information that was not available at that time. Similarly, RAB`s actions for the use of a particular method, such as the acquisition price method (as defined in paragraph g) (5) (ii) of this section, to assess the amount of arm length calculated in a PCT, should not be recalculated on the basis of information that was not available at the time of the PCT. However, this point (1) (i) limits the use of information later available by the Commissioner for the purposes of his investigations into the attribution referred to in paragraph (i) (commissioner`s allocations in relation to a CSA) in this section. (4) Date and mode of choice. The choice in this paragraph, d) (2) (iii) (b) (B) is made by an explicit reference to the choice in the written cost-sharing agreement required in paragraph b) 4 of this section, or to a written amendment to the cost-sharing agreement reached with the Commissioner`s agreement in accordance with paragraph d) (2) (C) of this section. In the case of a qualified cost-sharing agreement reached on August 26, 2003, the election must be amended in writing by the last due date (for renewals) of a federal income tax return of a controlled member for the first taxable year beginning after August 26, 2003, and approval from the Commissioner is not required.
(B) evaluation on the basis of the MPC. The current value of the PCT Payor s. license alternative can be determined using the comparable gain method described in figure 1.482-5. In this case, the present value of the licence alternative referred to in paragraph g) (4) (iii) (A) of this section is determined, with the exception of the fact that PcT Payor`s licence payments within the meaning of paragraph (j) (1) (i) of this section are determined, during each period, so that they correspond to the reasonably expected remnants of the profits or partial losses that would be generated under the cost-sharing alternative. , net of operating contributions collected under the cost-sharing alternative, minus market returns for routine contributions referred to in paragraph j) (1) (i) of this section. However, the treatment of net operating contributions as an operating contribution is coordinated with the processing of other routine contributions in accordance with this paragraph, in order to avoid double market returns on these contributions.